Compliance Considerations When Communicating Merit Increases

Publication
Workplace Weekly
Communication
Compensation Planning
Read time: 3 mins

By: John Keck, Compensation Director, MRA.

Even though merit conversations are people-centered, they’re also high-risk communication moments. Employers must stay aligned with compensation policies, pay transparency requirements, pay equity considerations, and confidentiality rules. Here’s what leaders and HR should be aware of.

1. Confidentiality: What Leaders Cannot Disclose

Depending on the jurisdiction, employers may be required to share salary ranges, explain the factors used to determine pay, or document how pay increases are determined. Even in states without formal pay transparency laws, employees increasingly expect clarity—meaning leaders should be prepared to provide accurate, consistent explanations.

2. Consistency With the Organization’s Compensation Policies

Leaders must communicate within the boundaries of established policy, including:

  • Pay philosophy
  • Pay range structure
  • Merit matrix or guidelines
  • Criteria for merit vs. market adjustments
  • How internal pay equity reviews are conducted

Deviating from policy (or improvising explanations) can lead to inconsistent treatment, creating a compliance risk.

3. Pay Transparency Requirements

Depending on the jurisdiction, employers may be required to share salary ranges, explain the factors used to determine pay, or document how pay increases are determined.

Even if a state pay transparency law does not directly cover the employer, employees expect more context, so messaging should be structured and accurate.

4. Internal Equity and Disparate Impact

Compliance issues can arise if merit decisions create or perpetuate inequities across groups. Before leaders communicate:

  • HR should review increases by gender, race/ethnicity, age, and other protected classes
  • Look for patterns that could suggest inconsistency or adverse impact
  • Correct issues before finalizing and communicating increases

This keeps the organization aligned with equal pay and nondiscrimination standards.

5. Documentation Requirements

Merit decisions should be well documented so the organization can demonstrate that they were made fairly and consistently. Documentation should include:

  • Performance evaluations
  • Merit rationale tied to documented criteria
  • Approvals and review steps
  • Notes used to guide decision-making
  • Any adjustments made for equity reasons

This protects the organization in the event of a complaint or audit.

6. Avoiding Problematic Language

Leaders should avoid statements that can be interpreted as:

  • Guarantees of future pay increases
  • Promises of continued employment
  • Bias (conscious or unconscious) in performance or pay reasoning
  • References to budget issues in a way that could feel retaliatory (“We couldn’t give you more because the department costs too much”)
  • Language that could suggest discrimination

All communication should focus on performance, pay frameworks, position in range, and clear criteria.

7. Alignment With Pay Practices and Local Laws

Organizations with employees in multiple states must ensure:

  • Merit messaging complies with the most protective jurisdiction
  • Managers know which employees are subject to which requirements
  • The company’s compensation philosophy is applied consistently across states

A mismatch between policy and practice is one of the most common compliance issues.

8. Avoiding Over Disclosure

Even in a transparency era, employers are not required to share:

  • Merit matrices
  • Budget percentages
  • Individualized formulas
  • Other employees’ pay or performance
  • Market data sources or proprietary survey details

Compliance is about clarity—not full disclosure.

9. Accessibility and Fairness in the Conversation Itself

Consistency in how merit conversations are delivered is also a compliance concern. Every employee—remote, on leave, part-time, or in-office—should receive their conversation within the established timeframe, and written follow-ups should be maintained appropriately. Even small inconsistencies in who receives a conversation or when it occurs can create risk.

Merit conversations are both human moments and compliance moments. When leaders communicate within policy, use consistent language, and stay grounded in transparent criteria, employees walk away feeling informed and respected—and the organization strengthens both equity and trust.

Looking to refine your compensation strategy or update your pay policies? MRA’s compensation team can guide you.